All of this literary style, a slight fallacy of composition, idea no is considered expression personal views on prejudice any circumstance. The point of view needs to be supported by sound reasons and additional motives.
Objective and features
This direction has the following characteristics. Small volume. Parameters can vary in relation to the object and the situation. For example, the maximum amount presented for Harvard business school students is two sheets of written text. The problem is always accurate. It is not inherent in symbolic expressions, imagery and even fuzzy reasoning, which anyone will be able to comprehend from their point of view. The basic position, which is exposed in the problem are shown and clearly defined. Disclosure of the object is made on the basis of it. The content is usually biased, for the reason that the purpose of the task is to show your idea, to Express your comprehension. Therefore, the same problem is revealed by different people in different ways. It should be. Paradoxes. Now this essay criterion is often omitted. Most linguists believe that the paradoxical statements, bright positions, conflict, at first glance, dual and also illogical arguments – a necessary proportion of the genre. Because it includes a style intended to overwhelm the reader. Ease of expression. In contrast to the work of reflection or research paper, it makes sense to keep the story very simple and legible, to avoid difficult turns of speech and syntactic structures, cliched words and phrases. The logic of the story, the semantic unity of the article. Perhaps because-at the moment ignored the paradoxical expressions and conditions. After all, it is necessary to be a real master of the word in order to make two incompatible provisions complementary. Conversational style of presentation. At the same time should maintain a balance, then, that the story was not overly sloppy. In addition, it is necessary to omit the use of slang, unless this use does not imply the meaning and theme necessarily.
How to write an essay: basic secrets
The specified feature of the genre – the full scope of the concept of structure and sayings thoughts. A single clear law – it is necessary to clearly state your opinion exactly on a given subject, which acts as a title.
Often the valid structure of an essay: enter the thesis-argument, conclusion.
The writer uses a special number of provisions for the sake of disclosure. The writer maintains the necessary volume of the article. However, this is a permitted but not inevitable structure. It can be arbitrary in General. It is permissible to present the conclusion in the form of a provision at the beginning, and to prove it in the text itself. Or it is allowed to put forward an idea that is refuted in the course of the essay. Then the conclusion is made completely opposite to the basic provision. As is permissible to present a couple of theses and arguments, and then draw a conclusion. Another order of ideas is possible.
Also don’t forget that usually the reader has a General idea about the topic of the essay. There is no need to disclose specific definitions and explain complex nuances. You should just Express your opinion on a given topic.
Content, examples, templates
There is no exact structure of the essay. A specific plan template in turn is not. For those who need a plan during the preparation of articles, it is possible to use the usual. The ordinary content includes the introduction, the main part and the conclusion. the introductory part, during which the basic position is put forward. In the main part, arguments are put forward to confirm the key thesis. Suppose you want to prove, in consequence of which the weakening of attention to the chronicle of our city has a bad effect on the growing generation. Care must be taken to ensure that there is no substitution of provisions. First, it is guided by the arguments to prove what was discussed in the introduction. Only after (if necessary) to put forward another statement. If there is a desire or a need, the following provisions are put forward in the same way with the grounds arising from the previous ones. the conclusion sums up everything said (written). The conclusion to which the author came in the process of reflection. The presented part is mandatory.